Historic Gasline Bibliography

• Sponsors: BP Exploration Alaska, Phillips Petroleum Co., Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd., Marubeni Corp.
• a LNG export project
• Looked at hooking into the Alaska Highway Gas Pipeline to take off gas, then deliver it to their tidewater LNG plant at Nikiski or Anderson Bay via a gas pipeline line alongside the oil pipeline.
• Later to planned to convert natural gas to gas liquids and transport it through the Trans Alaska Oil Pipeline. Possible market would be Asia and Mexico.
• began effort in October 1998

Name changed To Northwest Alaskan Pipeline, also called Alaska Highway Pipeline

• ANGTS Proposal
• Gas pipeline route Selected by the President and Canada to deliver gas from the North Slope to the U.S.. It followed TAPS pipeline to Fairbanks, then the Alaska Highway to connect with pipelines in Canada.
• 1976-present

• Sponsors: Alaska Gasline Port Authority, Yukon Pacific Co.?
• Buried gas pipeline from Prudhoe Bay to tidewater at Valdez, or Nikiski running parallel to the TAPS
• Gas conditioning plant at North Slope to remove impurities, compress and chill gas. At Valdez gas is fractioned into its various components, then converted into LNG and liquid petroleum gases for shipping. The plan included a spur line from Glenallen to connect with the existing South Central natural gas grid and provide gas to South-Central Alaska and the Kenai Peninsula
• from 2006 flier

• other name for the Trans-Alaska Gas System TAGS
• also used for the El Paso Proposal

• Sponsors: Arctic Resources Company (ARC) and ArctiGas Resources Ltd.
• Partnership taking a pipeline over-the-top. They announced that they would turn the finished pipeline over to Alaska municipalities (for the Alaska Segment) and Canadian First Nation groups ( for the Canadian pipeline segment.)

• not North Slope Gas

Also called Dempster Line

• Sponsor: Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd.
• Proposed pipeline to deliver Mackenzie Delta gas to Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, and connect with the Alaska Highway Gas Pipeline (ANGTS.) This was a requirement of Canada's National Energy Board for the ANGTS project.
• 1977

• not North Slope
• pipeline from the Cook Inlet Beluga field to Fairbanks.

• part of ANGTS
• Alaska border to Whitehorse, connect in the Dempster Line there, divide at St. James River.

• competitor for ANGTS approval
• Proposal to deliver gas from the North Slope to tidewater by pipeline, then convert to LNG and ship to Western US markets.

• Sponsor: BP
• Convert natural gas to Natural Gas liquids (NGL) which would then be transported through the Trans Alaska Oil Pipeline

• Consortium of Canadian Natural gas owners: Imperial Oil, ExxonMobil, Shell and Conoco.
• transport Mackenzie Delta gas south along the Mackenzie River Valley to existing pipelines in Alberta.

• Sponsors: Alberta Gas Trunkline, Westcoast Transmission Co., Foothills Pipeline Ltd.
• Proposal to build a 42" low pressure pipeline to deliver Mackenzie Delta gas to Alberta.
• Proposal was filed spring of 1975.

Commonly called the Producers Pipeline Group.

• Sponsors: ExxonMobil, BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. , Phillips Alaska Inc.
• evaluated 2 routes: the Alaska Highway Route (the Southern Route), and the Over-the-Top Route (the Northern Route.) The over-the-top route considered either a near shore, or offshore pipeline buried under the Beaufort Sea. The over-the-top pipeline would hopefully link to the Mackenzie Delta Stand-Alone.

• Sponsors: ArctiGas Resources Corp.
• an over-the-top pipeline proposal

This was the name of two proposals under consideration in 2000.

• The North American Natural Gas Pipeline group proposed either offshore or nearshore buried pipeline through the Beaufort Sea to the Mackenzie Delta.
• Arctic Resources Company (ARC) and ArctiGas Resources Ltd. Partnership proposed taking a pipeline over-the-top. they announced that they would turn the finished pipeline in the hands of Alaska municipalities (for the Alaska Segment) and Canadian First Nation groups ( for the Canadian pipeline segment.) ARC argued that this would make the project exempt from corporate income taxes in both countries, thus lowering operating costs.

• not Alaskan.
• Gas pipeline proposal from Arctic Island to Ontario.

• not Alaskan.

• not North Slope gas
• Cook Inlet gas project that was evaluated heard at the same time as the ANGTS proposals. The California receiving terminal hearings were combined with the LNG terminal hearings for their receiving terminal in 74 & 75. Pacific Alaska LNG Associates was involved with this.

• Sponsors: Yukon Pacific Corporation (subsidiary of CSX Corp)
• 42" pipeline from Prudhoe Bay to Anderson Bay, Port Valdez. Includes a liquefaction plant and marine terminal complex at Anderson Bay and LNG tankers to deliver gas to Asian markets. They planned to use a gas conditioning plant at the north slope.
• 1983-1997?

• not North Slope
• Sponsors: Pacific Lighting Corp., Pacific Alaska LNG Co., Pacific Marine Co., Western LNG Terminal Co., Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Alaska California LNG Co., Pacific Gas Marine Co., Pacific Gas LNG Terminal Co.
• Planned to build terminals in California to receive LNG from Alaska.
• 1979-1981

• Sponsor: Alaska Gasline Port Authority
• Construct pipeline along Alaska Highway to mid-North America, with a spur line to Valdez where gas would be converted to LNG and shipped to Asia, Western U.S. and Mexico.